<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CodeGear releases Ruby on Rails IDE &#8220;3rdRail&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/</link>
	<description>We think it. We do it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>@David I: I appreciate you posting here. I started with Delphi v1.0 and have been a big fan of that IDE since the beginning. Overall, I&#039;ve been very happy with the Delphi IDE over the years, and I&#039;m eager to see how that translates into a Rails product.

You definitely make a great point about Rails being a moving target! I&#039;m actually holding off on a couple of projects now because of the promise of a few new things in 2.0. I&#039;m still a little on the fence about the cost of 3rdRail compared to other Rails IDE options that cost less, or nothing at all, but I do indeed have some Borland/CodeGear loyalty, and I&#039;m certainly not afraid to put my money toward something if it does the job particularly well. I&#039;ll be spending some more time with the trial (we just had a new baby, so most things are on hold at the moment), and I&#039;m strongly encouraging others out there to do the same. I look forward to seeing the upcoming roadmap on CDN, too.
 
Thanks again for your reply. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David I: I appreciate you posting here. I started with Delphi v1.0 and have been a big fan of that IDE since the beginning. Overall, I&#8217;ve been very happy with the Delphi IDE over the years, and I&#8217;m eager to see how that translates into a Rails product.</p>
<p>You definitely make a great point about Rails being a moving target! I&#8217;m actually holding off on a couple of projects now because of the promise of a few new things in 2.0. I&#8217;m still a little on the fence about the cost of 3rdRail compared to other Rails IDE options that cost less, or nothing at all, but I do indeed have some Borland/CodeGear loyalty, and I&#8217;m certainly not afraid to put my money toward something if it does the job particularly well. I&#8217;ll be spending some more time with the trial (we just had a new baby, so most things are on hold at the moment), and I&#8217;m strongly encouraging others out there to do the same. I look forward to seeing the upcoming roadmap on CDN, too.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your reply. <img src='http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidi99</title>
		<link>http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>davidi99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexfalkenberg.com/2007/09/18/codegear-releases-ruby-on-rails-ide-3rdrail/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&gt; I&#039;m a little concerned about the $300 annual subscription for maintenance... I hate paying for bug fixes. I understand CodeGear&#039;s saying &quot;updates&quot;, too, but when--especially in the first year--are any &quot;updates&quot; really anything but features that should have been in the product at release, or fixes for bugs that shouldn&#039;t have ever seen the release date?

Bug fixes yes, new features (yes, not just things that didn&#039;t make it into the first release - a roadmap will be available on CDN soon), but more importantly, Ruby and Rails are moving targets.

Rails is moving towards 2.0, and Matz is promising a Ruby Christmas gift.

Of course, everyone has to make their own decision, but the built-in first year maintenance and low price for the product + maintenance should be attractive to all developers.

David Intersimone, &quot;David I&quot;
VP, Developer Relations and Chief Evangelist
CodeGear (from Borland)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> I&#8217;m a little concerned about the $300 annual subscription for maintenance&#8230; I hate paying for bug fixes. I understand CodeGear&#8217;s saying &#8220;updates&#8221;, too, but when&#8211;especially in the first year&#8211;are any &#8220;updates&#8221; really anything but features that should have been in the product at release, or fixes for bugs that shouldn&#8217;t have ever seen the release date?</p>
<p>Bug fixes yes, new features (yes, not just things that didn&#8217;t make it into the first release &#8211; a roadmap will be available on CDN soon), but more importantly, Ruby and Rails are moving targets.</p>
<p>Rails is moving towards 2.0, and Matz is promising a Ruby Christmas gift.</p>
<p>Of course, everyone has to make their own decision, but the built-in first year maintenance and low price for the product + maintenance should be attractive to all developers.</p>
<p>David Intersimone, &#8220;David I&#8221;<br />
VP, Developer Relations and Chief Evangelist<br />
CodeGear (from Borland)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

